<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Uh, Rahm? Interesting antecedent</title>
	<link>http://gearino.com/index.php/2009/03/23/with-antecedents-like-this-who-needs-consensus/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 09:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Shannon</title>
		<link>http://gearino.com/index.php/2009/03/23/with-antecedents-like-this-who-needs-consensus/#comment-9254</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gearino.com/index.php/2009/03/23/with-antecedents-like-this-who-needs-consensus/#comment-9254</guid>
					<description>This was a real stretch, with no point, as far as I can see. Enjoyed reading your blog up til now. Since I am also a promiscuous reader, I guess I'll go in search of someone a little more insightful to read now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a real stretch, with no point, as far as I can see. Enjoyed reading your blog up til now. Since I am also a promiscuous reader, I guess I&#8217;ll go in search of someone a little more insightful to read now.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: lippzee</title>
		<link>http://gearino.com/index.php/2009/03/23/with-antecedents-like-this-who-needs-consensus/#comment-9214</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gearino.com/index.php/2009/03/23/with-antecedents-like-this-who-needs-consensus/#comment-9214</guid>
					<description>that one explanation which leaped to your mind is unsuccessful.  try taking the foot out of your mouth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that one explanation which leaped to your mind is unsuccessful.  try taking the foot out of your mouth.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: RaoulDuke</title>
		<link>http://gearino.com/index.php/2009/03/23/with-antecedents-like-this-who-needs-consensus/#comment-9206</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 01:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gearino.com/index.php/2009/03/23/with-antecedents-like-this-who-needs-consensus/#comment-9206</guid>
					<description>Couple of things leap to mind -- that 'both parties work together' was Rahm trying to take the foot out of his mouth. Unsuccessfully, methinks. Dan -- I recognize you're being a snarky ass. I just expect higher-grade snark. And Bushitler isn't clever, has no cha-cha and you can't dance to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couple of things leap to mind &#8212; that &#8216;both parties work together&#8217; was Rahm trying to take the foot out of his mouth. Unsuccessfully, methinks. Dan &#8212; I recognize you&#8217;re being a snarky ass. I just expect higher-grade snark. And Bushitler isn&#8217;t clever, has no cha-cha and you can&#8217;t dance to it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Truth</title>
		<link>http://gearino.com/index.php/2009/03/23/with-antecedents-like-this-who-needs-consensus/#comment-9205</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 01:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gearino.com/index.php/2009/03/23/with-antecedents-like-this-who-needs-consensus/#comment-9205</guid>
					<description>No one agrees with you GD?  Always nice to be first.  A fresh bold slice of reality indeed!

&quot;Let me hasten to say that I&quot; ... &quot;mean to suggest that Lenin and Emanuel are equivalents in evil.&quot;  Upseting?  Undoubtedly.  True?  Even more so.  Don't believe me?  File it away and read it again too years from now.  Prophetic?  Positively not.  Any honest student of history would recognize as much.  We are in for some difficult times people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one agrees with you GD?  Always nice to be first.  A fresh bold slice of reality indeed!</p>
<p>&#8220;Let me hasten to say that I&#8221; &#8230; &#8220;mean to suggest that Lenin and Emanuel are equivalents in evil.&#8221;  Upseting?  Undoubtedly.  True?  Even more so.  Don&#8217;t believe me?  File it away and read it again too years from now.  Prophetic?  Positively not.  Any honest student of history would recognize as much.  We are in for some difficult times people.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: lippzee</title>
		<link>http://gearino.com/index.php/2009/03/23/with-antecedents-like-this-who-needs-consensus/#comment-9204</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gearino.com/index.php/2009/03/23/with-antecedents-like-this-who-needs-consensus/#comment-9204</guid>
					<description>no.  can you explain why you think it was 'lame' to say it is an opportunity for both parties to work together towards a solution?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no.  can you explain why you think it was &#8216;lame&#8217; to say it is an opportunity for both parties to work together towards a solution?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mikey</title>
		<link>http://gearino.com/index.php/2009/03/23/with-antecedents-like-this-who-needs-consensus/#comment-9201</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 22:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gearino.com/index.php/2009/03/23/with-antecedents-like-this-who-needs-consensus/#comment-9201</guid>
					<description>Can we all agree that it was pretty 'lame' for Mr. Emanuel to make that statement in the first place while so many people  were paralized with fear, and open himself up to these slings and arrows?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can we all agree that it was pretty &#8216;lame&#8217; for Mr. Emanuel to make that statement in the first place while so many people  were paralized with fear, and open himself up to these slings and arrows?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Suburban Kamikaze</title>
		<link>http://gearino.com/index.php/2009/03/23/with-antecedents-like-this-who-needs-consensus/#comment-9199</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gearino.com/index.php/2009/03/23/with-antecedents-like-this-who-needs-consensus/#comment-9199</guid>
					<description>My mom used to always say stuff like that. It was really annoying. I just never recognized it as bolshevism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My mom used to always say stuff like that. It was really annoying. I just never recognized it as bolshevism.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: lippzee</title>
		<link>http://gearino.com/index.php/2009/03/23/with-antecedents-like-this-who-needs-consensus/#comment-9198</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gearino.com/index.php/2009/03/23/with-antecedents-like-this-who-needs-consensus/#comment-9198</guid>
					<description>Dan, this tender soul can't abide the sight of you making such a snarky ass of yourself.  Reread Emanuel's quote.  He doesn't say his party should take partisan advantage of the situation, but that &quot;the problems are big enough that they lend themselves to ideas from both parties for the solution.&quot;  He's actually saying the opposite of what Lenin said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, this tender soul can&#8217;t abide the sight of you making such a snarky ass of yourself.  Reread Emanuel&#8217;s quote.  He doesn&#8217;t say his party should take partisan advantage of the situation, but that &#8220;the problems are big enough that they lend themselves to ideas from both parties for the solution.&#8221;  He&#8217;s actually saying the opposite of what Lenin said.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Sheila</title>
		<link>http://gearino.com/index.php/2009/03/23/with-antecedents-like-this-who-needs-consensus/#comment-9196</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gearino.com/index.php/2009/03/23/with-antecedents-like-this-who-needs-consensus/#comment-9196</guid>
					<description>Stretching a bit there, aren't you Dan?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stretching a bit there, aren&#8217;t you Dan?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Locomotive Breath</title>
		<link>http://gearino.com/index.php/2009/03/23/with-antecedents-like-this-who-needs-consensus/#comment-9192</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gearino.com/index.php/2009/03/23/with-antecedents-like-this-who-needs-consensus/#comment-9192</guid>
					<description>Gearino, thanks for pointing this out. Same process just less bloodshed. I hope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gearino, thanks for pointing this out. Same process just less bloodshed. I hope.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

