<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Links gone wild!</title>
	<link>http://gearino.com/index.php/2008/08/28/links-gone-wild-32/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 00:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: C. Espejo</title>
		<link>http://gearino.com/index.php/2008/08/28/links-gone-wild-32/#comment-3604</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 00:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gearino.com/index.php/2008/08/28/links-gone-wild-32/#comment-3604</guid>
					<description>It shouldn't be news to anyone that nearly anyone can learn basic journalistic skills in four months. But so what? Anyone can learn the basics of playing piano or ballroom dancing in three to four months. Few can do it competently and even fewer can do it well. 

For a 30-year newsroom veteran, do you really believe that all journalist do is show up at press conferences and ask a few impertinent questions? You write as if anyone can be a political cartoonist, investigative reporter, war correspondent, combat photographer, influential movie critic, syndicated columnist, successful humorist, graphic artist, even beat reporter. Anyone can write book-length investigations on any topic under the sun. Journalism is a deceptively simple term but it's a category that includes dozens of jobs, most of which you couldn't perform, despite your 30 years in the business.

Sure, the work many reporters do is probably not beyond the ken of an intelligent person, but it requires years of experience to develop proficiency, spot trends and write with authority — not four months. If it were just four months, a gaggle of summer interns could run the damn paper, son.

Your jab at newsroom ethics is out of left field. Journalists are constrained by some of the most stringent ethics rules in whitecollardom. They can't contribute to a political candidate, can't speak at a city council meeting, can't accept lunches or trips — they can't do many things most employees take for granted. Your old pals at McClatchy aren't even allowed to write personal blogs, like your own oracle: www.gearino.com.

Your faith in the power of bloggers is naively charming. Let's say the N&amp;#38;O shuts down for financial insolvency and some blogger decides to take on the Easley administration. Your blogging hero, not backed up by First Amendment lawyers, calls the mayor's flack and says: Send me all your e-mails from your last meeting on subject X. Okay, the blogger fails to get his e-mails, but as the mayor's people are still laughing over this joker, the blogger has decided to devote 50 hours a week of his time to cover this beat. He'll assign graphics, put in research requests, dispatch photographers, develop a Rolodex of sources and prepare a list of enterprise story ideas. Wait, there's a hurricane coming. Our blogger has to drop what he's doing and activate the natural disaster coverage plan. Of course he's prepared one -- he's a blogger after all, one of the best in the business. Now, we need to rent 4WD vehicles, buy extra insurance ... anyway, you get the picture. Your bloggers just aren't up to the task. They never will be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It shouldn&#8217;t be news to anyone that nearly anyone can learn basic journalistic skills in four months. But so what? Anyone can learn the basics of playing piano or ballroom dancing in three to four months. Few can do it competently and even fewer can do it well. </p>
<p>For a 30-year newsroom veteran, do you really believe that all journalist do is show up at press conferences and ask a few impertinent questions? You write as if anyone can be a political cartoonist, investigative reporter, war correspondent, combat photographer, influential movie critic, syndicated columnist, successful humorist, graphic artist, even beat reporter. Anyone can write book-length investigations on any topic under the sun. Journalism is a deceptively simple term but it&#8217;s a category that includes dozens of jobs, most of which you couldn&#8217;t perform, despite your 30 years in the business.</p>
<p>Sure, the work many reporters do is probably not beyond the ken of an intelligent person, but it requires years of experience to develop proficiency, spot trends and write with authority — not four months. If it were just four months, a gaggle of summer interns could run the damn paper, son.</p>
<p>Your jab at newsroom ethics is out of left field. Journalists are constrained by some of the most stringent ethics rules in whitecollardom. They can&#8217;t contribute to a political candidate, can&#8217;t speak at a city council meeting, can&#8217;t accept lunches or trips — they can&#8217;t do many things most employees take for granted. Your old pals at McClatchy aren&#8217;t even allowed to write personal blogs, like your own oracle: <a href='http://www.gearino.com.' rel='nofollow'>www.gearino.com.</a></p>
<p>Your faith in the power of bloggers is naively charming. Let&#8217;s say the N&amp;O shuts down for financial insolvency and some blogger decides to take on the Easley administration. Your blogging hero, not backed up by First Amendment lawyers, calls the mayor&#8217;s flack and says: Send me all your e-mails from your last meeting on subject X. Okay, the blogger fails to get his e-mails, but as the mayor&#8217;s people are still laughing over this joker, the blogger has decided to devote 50 hours a week of his time to cover this beat. He&#8217;ll assign graphics, put in research requests, dispatch photographers, develop a Rolodex of sources and prepare a list of enterprise story ideas. Wait, there&#8217;s a hurricane coming. Our blogger has to drop what he&#8217;s doing and activate the natural disaster coverage plan. Of course he&#8217;s prepared one &#8212; he&#8217;s a blogger after all, one of the best in the business. Now, we need to rent 4WD vehicles, buy extra insurance &#8230; anyway, you get the picture. Your bloggers just aren&#8217;t up to the task. They never will be.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Simon Scowl</title>
		<link>http://gearino.com/index.php/2008/08/28/links-gone-wild-32/#comment-3598</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gearino.com/index.php/2008/08/28/links-gone-wild-32/#comment-3598</guid>
					<description>&quot;No apology necessary.&quot;

Whew!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;No apology necessary.&#8221;</p>
<p>Whew!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: lippzee</title>
		<link>http://gearino.com/index.php/2008/08/28/links-gone-wild-32/#comment-3597</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gearino.com/index.php/2008/08/28/links-gone-wild-32/#comment-3597</guid>
					<description>No apology necessary.  Your misuse of the saying didn't cause any confusion -- for me anyway.  Edwards dealt with the problem about as well as he created the problem.  Maybe there will turn out to be a crime.  At least we won't have to see or hear from him for a while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No apology necessary.  Your misuse of the saying didn&#8217;t cause any confusion &#8212; for me anyway.  Edwards dealt with the problem about as well as he created the problem.  Maybe there will turn out to be a crime.  At least we won&#8217;t have to see or hear from him for a while.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Simon Scowl</title>
		<link>http://gearino.com/index.php/2008/08/28/links-gone-wild-32/#comment-3596</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 20:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gearino.com/index.php/2008/08/28/links-gone-wild-32/#comment-3596</guid>
					<description>Sorry, I thought you'd be familiar with the saying &quot;the coverup is worse than the crime.&quot; It's a shorthand way of saying that the initial problem has been dwarfed by the way Edwards has dealt with that problem. My apologies for the confusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I thought you&#8217;d be familiar with the saying &#8220;the coverup is worse than the crime.&#8221; It&#8217;s a shorthand way of saying that the initial problem has been dwarfed by the way Edwards has dealt with that problem. My apologies for the confusion.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John</title>
		<link>http://gearino.com/index.php/2008/08/28/links-gone-wild-32/#comment-3595</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 20:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gearino.com/index.php/2008/08/28/links-gone-wild-32/#comment-3595</guid>
					<description>Mr. Gearino,

Enjoyed the article in Business NC.    

Nice pic above the byline too.  Hubba, hubba.  Talk about 
rakish good looks and a come-hither expression.  You got it in spades pal.  If you're currently unincumbered by female companionship, you oughtta renew your subscription to eHarmony and forward that image on to 'em quick, fast and in a hurry.  I predict potential life-mates will be beating a path to your inbox before you can sing Viva Viagra.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Gearino,</p>
<p>Enjoyed the article in Business NC.    </p>
<p>Nice pic above the byline too.  Hubba, hubba.  Talk about<br />
rakish good looks and a come-hither expression.  You got it in spades pal.  If you&#8217;re currently unincumbered by female companionship, you oughtta renew your subscription to eHarmony and forward that image on to &#8216;em quick, fast and in a hurry.  I predict potential life-mates will be beating a path to your inbox before you can sing Viva Viagra.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: lippzee</title>
		<link>http://gearino.com/index.php/2008/08/28/links-gone-wild-32/#comment-3594</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 20:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gearino.com/index.php/2008/08/28/links-gone-wild-32/#comment-3594</guid>
					<description>Simon Scowl (Deceiver),

So far there hasn't been any crime, but a lot of, in G.D.'s nice words, &quot;rank speculation&quot; and &quot;braying moralists.&quot;  I can empathize with you for wanting to go after the hypocrite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simon Scowl (Deceiver),</p>
<p>So far there hasn&#8217;t been any crime, but a lot of, in G.D.&#8217;s nice words, &#8220;rank speculation&#8221; and &#8220;braying moralists.&#8221;  I can empathize with you for wanting to go after the hypocrite.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Simon Scowl</title>
		<link>http://gearino.com/index.php/2008/08/28/links-gone-wild-32/#comment-3592</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 17:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gearino.com/index.php/2008/08/28/links-gone-wild-32/#comment-3592</guid>
					<description>That last quote was from before Edwards did his limited hangout on Nightline, of course. And since then it's become clear that the coverup is worse than the crime. This is no longer just a story about sins of the flesh.

Anyway, thanks for the nice words, G.D.!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That last quote was from before Edwards did his limited hangout on Nightline, of course. And since then it&#8217;s become clear that the coverup is worse than the crime. This is no longer just a story about sins of the flesh.</p>
<p>Anyway, thanks for the nice words, G.D.!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: lippzee</title>
		<link>http://gearino.com/index.php/2008/08/28/links-gone-wild-32/#comment-3591</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gearino.com/index.php/2008/08/28/links-gone-wild-32/#comment-3591</guid>
					<description>&quot;Surely you’re not surprised that John Edwards and Rielle Hunter have disappeared from the pages of most mainstream daily newspapers (which didn’t want to report on their tawdry saga, held their noses as they reluctantly did so, and threw the whole mess on the old-news heap as soon as they could). But if you’ve still got an interest in the story, check out Deceiver’s archive of all things John- and Rielle-related. It’s an amazing collection of news tidbits vacuumed up from a variety of sources, along with healthy doses of rank speculation. Be forewarned, however: It’s easy to get sucked into the countless links to other sites and realize that a whole morning has gone by. Fill the coffee pot, because it’ll be at least a two-cup journey.&quot; -- G.D. Gearino, August 28, 2008

&quot;Despite claims such as this one, the media’s performance in this instance isn’t a case of a compliant press coddling a liberal politician. There are obvious reasons for the media’s reluctance to dive into this story, not the least of them being that the sins of the flesh are universal and minor. This story really isn’t that big a deal. C’mon. Do you really think the media’s highest and best function is to be a braying mob of moralists?&quot; -- G.D. Gearino, August 1, 2008</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Surely you’re not surprised that John Edwards and Rielle Hunter have disappeared from the pages of most mainstream daily newspapers (which didn’t want to report on their tawdry saga, held their noses as they reluctantly did so, and threw the whole mess on the old-news heap as soon as they could). But if you’ve still got an interest in the story, check out Deceiver’s archive of all things John- and Rielle-related. It’s an amazing collection of news tidbits vacuumed up from a variety of sources, along with healthy doses of rank speculation. Be forewarned, however: It’s easy to get sucked into the countless links to other sites and realize that a whole morning has gone by. Fill the coffee pot, because it’ll be at least a two-cup journey.&#8221; &#8212; G.D. Gearino, August 28, 2008</p>
<p>&#8220;Despite claims such as this one, the media’s performance in this instance isn’t a case of a compliant press coddling a liberal politician. There are obvious reasons for the media’s reluctance to dive into this story, not the least of them being that the sins of the flesh are universal and minor. This story really isn’t that big a deal. C’mon. Do you really think the media’s highest and best function is to be a braying mob of moralists?&#8221; &#8212; G.D. Gearino, August 1, 2008
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: BP</title>
		<link>http://gearino.com/index.php/2008/08/28/links-gone-wild-32/#comment-3590</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gearino.com/index.php/2008/08/28/links-gone-wild-32/#comment-3590</guid>
					<description>Loved the Business NC article, and have to agree. The 'dirty secret' comment reminded me of Gorden Sinclair's autobiography where he talks about becoming a newsman at the Toronto Star.
With all the changes at the N&amp;#38;O my wife and I dropped the paper. Being creatures of habit, and not morning people who want to talk to each other over coffee, the experiment lasted about a week. I will continue to grumble about the changes, but probable continue to get the damn thing until it buries itself.
I love the idea of the newspaper, although not what McGreedy Publishing Corp. thinks it should be. I get much of my news online, but still enjoy coffee and the paper in the morning. Though, with the local columnists it has lost much of its charm. I look back with fondness on those times I lived where there were two competing papers in town. In Tucson we had the Citizen and the Daily Star. Readers of the Citizen refered to the latter as the Red Star, which gives you an idea of the editorial bent of both papers. Neither were great newspapers but it was nice to have a choice. The local independent paper the Tucson Weekly always lambasted both. I still read the Weekly online. Not as fun as picking up the paper in the Bohemian section of town, but I wouldn't miss Tom Danehy's column and would recommend folks take a look.
As for the N&amp;#38;O I'm still trying to decide if the executives were born idiots or worked there way up (or down as the case may be).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loved the Business NC article, and have to agree. The &#8216;dirty secret&#8217; comment reminded me of Gorden Sinclair&#8217;s autobiography where he talks about becoming a newsman at the Toronto Star.<br />
With all the changes at the N&amp;O my wife and I dropped the paper. Being creatures of habit, and not morning people who want to talk to each other over coffee, the experiment lasted about a week. I will continue to grumble about the changes, but probable continue to get the damn thing until it buries itself.<br />
I love the idea of the newspaper, although not what McGreedy Publishing Corp. thinks it should be. I get much of my news online, but still enjoy coffee and the paper in the morning. Though, with the local columnists it has lost much of its charm. I look back with fondness on those times I lived where there were two competing papers in town. In Tucson we had the Citizen and the Daily Star. Readers of the Citizen refered to the latter as the Red Star, which gives you an idea of the editorial bent of both papers. Neither were great newspapers but it was nice to have a choice. The local independent paper the Tucson Weekly always lambasted both. I still read the Weekly online. Not as fun as picking up the paper in the Bohemian section of town, but I wouldn&#8217;t miss Tom Danehy&#8217;s column and would recommend folks take a look.<br />
As for the N&amp;O I&#8217;m still trying to decide if the executives were born idiots or worked there way up (or down as the case may be).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Barb</title>
		<link>http://gearino.com/index.php/2008/08/28/links-gone-wild-32/#comment-3589</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 12:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gearino.com/index.php/2008/08/28/links-gone-wild-32/#comment-3589</guid>
					<description>I have a two-part comment.

1. I read your Business NC piece and tried to leave a comment, but I don't think it went through due to some entry error, so here are my two cents on that:

Well said, G.D. One thing to add: as the newspapers that land on our doorstep get thinner--with less local news--and the advertising gets more obnoxious (stickers over headlining copy!), we're alienating more and more readers; not the die-hards like us who will always prefer to read the paper on the back deck, flipping pages rather than having a steaming laptop on our legs, but we're losing the old-timers who still buy the paper out of habit. If the current readers feel that the N&amp;#38;O isn't worth the ~$150 price tag per year and they'd rather just get their news from the TV (gah!), there's not a next generation who are going to be picking up their slack. I'm not sure what else I can do to help promote newspapers other than show my children what a big part of our lives they are, just like my parents did for me. I hope newspapers survive this blip and still exist for my own children when they're adults.

2. The Where the Hell is Matt? video gives me goosebumps. I watch that video several times a week (in fact, the order of my bookmarks is ... Where the Hell is Matt? ... G.D. Gearino ... etc.) and it makes me both happy and sad. Happy because I love the story -- just some guy who decided to see the world rather than work in a cubicle; then he gets sponsored to do it again, not once, but twice (http://www.wherethehellismatt.com/about.shtml). Sad because I'm itching to see more of the world, but it will be many years before I can venture very far (with two small children and two full-time jobs, we're not exactly in the place where we can go very far right now, but that time will come when we're older...). If you have some time to kill or you're doing mindless work that allows you to listen, I recommend the lecture at the link I pasted above. It's really fun to hear Matt describe his adventures, and it gives me an appreciation for how thankful he is for his experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a two-part comment.</p>
<p>1. I read your Business NC piece and tried to leave a comment, but I don&#8217;t think it went through due to some entry error, so here are my two cents on that:</p>
<p>Well said, G.D. One thing to add: as the newspapers that land on our doorstep get thinner&#8211;with less local news&#8211;and the advertising gets more obnoxious (stickers over headlining copy!), we&#8217;re alienating more and more readers; not the die-hards like us who will always prefer to read the paper on the back deck, flipping pages rather than having a steaming laptop on our legs, but we&#8217;re losing the old-timers who still buy the paper out of habit. If the current readers feel that the N&amp;O isn&#8217;t worth the ~$150 price tag per year and they&#8217;d rather just get their news from the TV (gah!), there&#8217;s not a next generation who are going to be picking up their slack. I&#8217;m not sure what else I can do to help promote newspapers other than show my children what a big part of our lives they are, just like my parents did for me. I hope newspapers survive this blip and still exist for my own children when they&#8217;re adults.</p>
<p>2. The Where the Hell is Matt? video gives me goosebumps. I watch that video several times a week (in fact, the order of my bookmarks is &#8230; Where the Hell is Matt? &#8230; G.D. Gearino &#8230; etc.) and it makes me both happy and sad. Happy because I love the story &#8212; just some guy who decided to see the world rather than work in a cubicle; then he gets sponsored to do it again, not once, but twice (http://www.wherethehellismatt.com/about.shtml). Sad because I&#8217;m itching to see more of the world, but it will be many years before I can venture very far (with two small children and two full-time jobs, we&#8217;re not exactly in the place where we can go very far right now, but that time will come when we&#8217;re older&#8230;). If you have some time to kill or you&#8217;re doing mindless work that allows you to listen, I recommend the lecture at the link I pasted above. It&#8217;s really fun to hear Matt describe his adventures, and it gives me an appreciation for how thankful he is for his experience.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

