<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Links gone wild!</title>
	<link>http://gearino.com/index.php/2008/05/01/links-gone-wild-25/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 23:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: John</title>
		<link>http://gearino.com/index.php/2008/05/01/links-gone-wild-25/#comment-2119</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 17:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gearino.com/index.php/2008/05/01/links-gone-wild-25/#comment-2119</guid>
					<description>So Hillary and the Dems are Tom Hagen and Michael is the yet-to-be-named saviour of western civilization.  OK.  Fair enough.  But the shoot-first hot-head is a couple neocons I never heard of or Rumsfeld?   

I persevere with the conviction that Dubyah's name will soon appear in the &quot;Sonny&quot; section, but it never does.  Did I miss it?

I  can only infer then, that  Dubyah's &quot;Fredo&quot;.   I think that's inaccurate.  Bush the Younger is not weak or a coward or a fool - he's not weak or a coward anyway; and he's loyal to a fault (i.e. albatrosses like Cheney and the aforementioned Rummy remain - or at least survived well beyond their political shelf life).  Fredo turned on Mikey in Godfather II.  That's behavior most un-Dubyah-like.

Is the lack of a direct Bush reference conspicuous in it's absence?  Is he trivialized?  Is he absolved of any responsibility or blame for our sorry state of affairs?  Do I need a life?  Maybe.  But in my defense, I only read the damned article once.  Theres' a GUNSMOKE marathon in progress on TVLand. 

What's the real-world parallel to Khartoum's head in bed with Jack Woltz?   Maybe it was supposed to be Shock and Awe.  How'ed that work out anyway?

I thought Links Gone Wild! was supposed to be music videos and word games.  This is too hard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Hillary and the Dems are Tom Hagen and Michael is the yet-to-be-named saviour of western civilization.  OK.  Fair enough.  But the shoot-first hot-head is a couple neocons I never heard of or Rumsfeld?   </p>
<p>I persevere with the conviction that Dubyah&#8217;s name will soon appear in the &#8220;Sonny&#8221; section, but it never does.  Did I miss it?</p>
<p>I  can only infer then, that  Dubyah&#8217;s &#8220;Fredo&#8221;.   I think that&#8217;s inaccurate.  Bush the Younger is not weak or a coward or a fool - he&#8217;s not weak or a coward anyway; and he&#8217;s loyal to a fault (i.e. albatrosses like Cheney and the aforementioned Rummy remain - or at least survived well beyond their political shelf life).  Fredo turned on Mikey in Godfather II.  That&#8217;s behavior most un-Dubyah-like.</p>
<p>Is the lack of a direct Bush reference conspicuous in it&#8217;s absence?  Is he trivialized?  Is he absolved of any responsibility or blame for our sorry state of affairs?  Do I need a life?  Maybe.  But in my defense, I only read the damned article once.  Theres&#8217; a GUNSMOKE marathon in progress on TVLand. </p>
<p>What&#8217;s the real-world parallel to Khartoum&#8217;s head in bed with Jack Woltz?   Maybe it was supposed to be Shock and Awe.  How&#8217;ed that work out anyway?</p>
<p>I thought Links Gone Wild! was supposed to be music videos and word games.  This is too hard.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

