<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hey, I&#8217;d sue, too</title>
	<link>http://gearino.com/index.php/2008/02/22/hey-id-sue-too/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 23:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: John</title>
		<link>http://gearino.com/index.php/2008/02/22/hey-id-sue-too/#comment-1340</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 13:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gearino.com/index.php/2008/02/22/hey-id-sue-too/#comment-1340</guid>
					<description>Dear Mr. Gearino.

I've taken quite a liking to the animated, typing Dan on your letterhead.  He's kinda cryptic; no Mona Lisa, mind you, but interesting nonetheless.

At first glance, you looks pissed (note the furrowed brow and scrunched eyebrows).  But if I look closer (and I have - many times), your lips betray a subtle smile.  So I figure Animated, Typing Dan is more bemused than hacked-off.

Your typing, animated Dan communicates on multiple levels too.  Sure he uses the written word.  But there's a more subtle monologue goin' on.  Pay heed to the cadence of the sound of the keystrokes.  I now understand that you're communicating to a smaller, more discerning audience; that'd be me.  It's kinda like the shrill sound of a dog whistle - which I can hear too, by the way.   

I now realize that you're send me a different message every day.  Wednesday's message was about your recent infatuation with Britney Spears.  Leave that alone Dan.  She's no good for you.  And yesterday's missive?  I am sorry to hear that your pink eye has flared up again.
 
I found today's message personally disturbing.  What's all this nonsense about a restraining order?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mr. Gearino.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve taken quite a liking to the animated, typing Dan on your letterhead.  He&#8217;s kinda cryptic; no Mona Lisa, mind you, but interesting nonetheless.</p>
<p>At first glance, you looks pissed (note the furrowed brow and scrunched eyebrows).  But if I look closer (and I have - many times), your lips betray a subtle smile.  So I figure Animated, Typing Dan is more bemused than hacked-off.</p>
<p>Your typing, animated Dan communicates on multiple levels too.  Sure he uses the written word.  But there&#8217;s a more subtle monologue goin&#8217; on.  Pay heed to the cadence of the sound of the keystrokes.  I now understand that you&#8217;re communicating to a smaller, more discerning audience; that&#8217;d be me.  It&#8217;s kinda like the shrill sound of a dog whistle - which I can hear too, by the way.   </p>
<p>I now realize that you&#8217;re send me a different message every day.  Wednesday&#8217;s message was about your recent infatuation with Britney Spears.  Leave that alone Dan.  She&#8217;s no good for you.  And yesterday&#8217;s missive?  I am sorry to hear that your pink eye has flared up again.</p>
<p>I found today&#8217;s message personally disturbing.  What&#8217;s all this nonsense about a restraining order?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

